Mardrax Posted January 29, 2007 Report Posted January 29, 2007 (edited) Teachers and students might no longer applywhen you hold the mirror allow me to scryblurring the lines that faintly dividethe ever-present bound'ry 'tween you and Iand our other sides-While I'd pledge this smile to wake you up every timethe sun's fuzzy rays light up the skyWhile I'd hold you nigh every time you would crygently caress the last tear from your eye-That would all go awryso I will just liejust let your thighfor now support mineuntil we will awakenlet this never die Edited August 16, 2015 by Mardrax
Appy Posted January 29, 2007 Report Posted January 29, 2007 *points at A hand on my belly and smiles* No other comment necessary from me
Quincunx Posted February 3, 2007 Report Posted February 3, 2007 That's the second unusual (to the point of incomprehensible) use of "fuzzy" in the past few poems. . .does someone have any insight to offer on when it became a synonym for "good" when applied to non-fuzzy objects?
reverie Posted February 4, 2007 Report Posted February 4, 2007 warm/warming shimmering (okay that's a hung stretch) drowsy/dosey reassuring charming fawning roosing soothing dreamlike or you go the other way: alarming arresting or just be different: hazy
Mardrax Posted February 4, 2007 Author Report Posted February 4, 2007 (edited) Non-fuzzy? From where I stand, sunlight can very well be fuzzy. Think that "heavily clouded sunday morning sun shining through light curtains" feeling. You may find different words to describe that, I will use this one. That said, my use and interpretation of the word here differs a whole lot from the way Appy used it in Fuzzy. I'm just painting a bit of environment with it, she's describing an entire situation, the entire memory of a considerable timespan, with that one word. I quite agree with that descriptor as well Never did it become a synonym for good though, as far as I know. That bit of explanation aside, I do apologise for delving into subjects which are a tad difficult, if not impossible to understand for "outsiders" with both our works. Then again, I do still think poetry in essence is meant for the reader to think about his own interpretation of what's written, not wonder about what the writer meant. As long as something makes sense to me, it's all valid as far as I'm concerned. I'm deeply sorry if, through writing things both she and I understand, I (or we) make anyone else feel alienated, but I see no reason to treat these works as any different than any other poetry. Let it mean to you what you feel it means Edited February 4, 2007 by Mardrax
Appy Posted February 4, 2007 Report Posted February 4, 2007 I would add my words to this, but.. well, he said it as it is and what I would like to say as well. Just adding my voice to the explanation of Fuzzy and each poem linked.
Recommended Posts