Valdar and Astralis Posted August 17, 2004 Report Posted August 17, 2004 Frighteningly logical. http://www.knight2king.net/Knight2King/weasleyisourking.html <--is a beleiver now, lol
Zadown Posted August 18, 2004 Report Posted August 18, 2004 Curiouser and curiouser .. I love stuff like this.
Katzaniel Posted August 18, 2004 Report Posted August 18, 2004 Yikes. If it's right, it sort of ruins a few things... but sort of not, since I'll have fun watching for more clues in the next books. Neat.
Izabella Posted August 18, 2004 Report Posted August 18, 2004 Hum. I'm skeptical, but I suppose it's possible. I'm tired and it's late... er... early, so I got a little confused. Is he referring to Ron as only the King in the chess game, or as the king in the next book? Becaue I'm pretty sure Rowling said that the king wasn't going to be one of the main characters. I sort of assumed it was Neville, actually.
Mynx Posted August 18, 2004 Report Posted August 18, 2004 Hmm... I can see it... I also think some of these people have a little too much time on their hands but hey, I can't talk. I have to admit, I like the way JKR ties everything together so neatly and seems to have everything planned out... For someone who wrote the first one in an attempt to bring in some cash for her family, she sure is good at crossing her tracks...
Gryphon Posted August 18, 2004 Report Posted August 18, 2004 Having now read everything on that webpage.. and finding it all very fascinating... I'm finding myself hoping like hell that it's all wrong. I dont quite know why, but I've a feeling that it'd be sad if the story and it's endgame were revealed too early on in the piece by deductive reasoning such as this. Maybe I'm just being weird?
Lady Celes Crusader Posted August 19, 2004 Report Posted August 19, 2004 Interesting read from a very well documented text.
Recommended Posts